Donic Quattro Formula

Donic Quattro Formula Rubber
Approx. $ 46 USD
Price $

User Ratings (13)

Speed 7.9
Spin 8.2
Control 7.8
Tackiness 1.8   
Slightly tacky
Weight 3.6   
Sponge Hardness 1.2   
Gears 5.0   
Throw Angle 6.4   
Medium high
Consistency 8.1
Durability 5.5   
Average durability
Overall 8.3 10
Manufacturer Details
Tensor No
Anti No
There are 2 users using the Donic Quattro Formula.

Reviews (8)

illumind  on 12/21/2015

Paired with Donic Dotec Walder AR blade. Didn't seem to do anything particularly well, or better than many other rubbers available on the market now (2015). The high throw, soft sponge and low control combination didn't work well together. Had the control been higher this rubber would make a lot more sense, however with the low control (I agree with the ratings) I found it doing nothing particularly well, or better than another rubber could for the same price. It did have a noticeably higher throw than a standard Hexer or Vega Europe/Vega Pro etc, but WITHOUT the control, spin or speed of them. Throw angle would be slightly lower than T05 though. There are many rubbers with better combinations of control and spin, control and speed, speed and throw etc etc. Unless the Dotec AR was a poor blade/rubber combination, the Community ratings tell the story. Eg, Durability 5.5 /10, Gears 5/10 etc. Very Average.
Dawid21  on 5/2/2013

Not so fast but very controllable and spinny rubber. Good choice for backhandside for all-around players. 2.0mm is best option for me i really like this rubber.
blackbird74  on 8/22/2012

Very soft sponge and light rubber utilising tensor. Control much better than most tensors due to the soft sponge (extra dwell time). Quite fast though meant for spin more than speed. Most suitable for all-rounder attack with extra control rather than all out speed.
santilohi  on 4/7/2012

Provada goma casi nueva, en una madera Joo Se hyuk me gust³, ,muy controlable rascando y cogiendo mucho efecto de Top Spin de derecho con goma negra,En cambio provada y ya un poco gastada tambien con goma negra en una Galaxy Nº 9, muy bien para picar de dray,pero para rascar de Top Pspin de derecho ,le faltaba adherencia ,y efectividad de Top Spin mas comparando con la Joo Se Hyuk,podria deberse a que duran poco y pierde pronto la adherencia y a que la Galaxy es mas rapida que la Joo. Por lo tanto prefiero gomas chinas , bien mas baratas o duraderas, como las Friendship 729, Superior , las Mercury-2 y Reactor-Globe 999-.Ventajas es Ligera - Desventajas Poca duracion y precio es cara,aunque no tanto como otras.Butterfly-.Stiga -Xiom.etc.
Thijs  on 4/15/2011

Played a complete season with this rubber for backhand. never loved it, never hated it so I'm going for something different next year. currently playing coppajo silver on forehand 2.1mm and I'm thinking on trying a thinner version for my backhand. not tacky enough for me and throw angle too high for my game

Review it!

Log in!

You must be logged in to leave a review/rating.
Log in / Create an account


* Actual prices will vary.

DISCLAIMER: Ratings/reviews are contributed by the table tennis community. does not certify their correctness.