Acacor's Rubber Ratings
Back to acacor's Profile
Here are Acacor's ratings and reviews. These ratings are useful because Acacor has his/her own standard and will rate and review the ping pong equipment accordingly, giving you accurate and useful ratings and reviews to aid you in your next online purchase.
DHS (1)

|
|
DHS Skyline 3-60 Mid Hard
Speed |
8.0 |
Spin |
8.0 |
Control |
10.0 |
Weight |
4.0 |
Gears |
10.0 |
|
Throw Angle |
6.0 |
Sponge Hardness |
5.0 |
|
|
Review of DHS Skyline 3-60 Mid HardOrdered from Eacheng. There was no indication for hardness at the site. But after arriving on the label I can see 37 degrees. I have Skyline TG 3 Neo and it is not similar on looks neither on playing. Sounds like tensor. Much more softer. Very linear and easy to play, not like TG3N, because for TG3N you have a classic chinese rubber, where you have to use your arm very well. 3-60 works like a japanese rubber. For spin, TG3N/10 and 3-60/8. Speed is same. Control TG3N/7,5 and 3-60/10. Loop and drive very easy. Seems you put the ball with your hands. 3-60 has a nice bouncing, not like TG3N that in a short movement if you come from Euro/Japanese rubber and is not used to chinese rubber the ball falls before the net. I was using it in a Yasaka Ma Lin extra offensive JTTA version. Since this blade has a very high control, together with 3-60 rubber you can realize how easy is to play. If you are a very good player, with a good shape on your body and arm movements, with the right technics for a chinese rubber, you can play and get benefit for the superb spin of TG3N. But if you play like Euro/Japanese style, maybe try 3-60. Anyway I think that Donic Bluefire JP 02 is better than 3-60. Now using G555 on backhand, RBP.
Nov 05, 2017 |
Donic (3)

|
|
Donic Bluefire JP 01 Turbo
Speed |
9.0 |
Spin |
9.7 |
Control |
9.5 |
Weight |
6.0 |
Gears |
7.0 |
|
Throw Angle |
10.0 |
Sponge Hardness |
5.0 |
Overall |
9.6 |
|
|
Review of Donic Bluefire JP 01 TurboExcelent rubber. Don't take serious the "turbo" label, because it's not really fast. For the speed and the spin, it has excelent control. Not heavy. I use it on a Speed 90 CP on forhand, and on this blade perform some slow. Throw angle, speed, control and spin higher than baracuda, which is on backhand. About spin, not like tenergy that comes with lots of energy, or like Omega4 that is less and comes with wavy trajectory, it's more linear but huge.
Oct 28, 2014 |
|
|
Donic Acuda Blue P1
|
Review of Donic Acuda Blue P1Cut has 45 gr. Low arch, and for this seems a little a chinese rubber like Skyline neo TG3, with more bouncing. Same spin as TG3. Much more control, because more linear than TG3.
I have Blue P1 turbo as well, and it is much more faster.
I used to play with a Blue fire JP 01 turbo. It's arch is higher, so to my game I prefer Blue Fire JP01T. The problem is that blue fire is heavier, 50 gr cut, and for RBP wheight is very important.
Feb 06, 2017 |
|
|
Donic Bluefire JP 02
Speed |
8.5 |
Spin |
9.0 |
Control |
9.0 |
Weight |
4.0 |
Gears |
10.0 |
|
Tackiness |
5.0 |
Throw Angle |
8.0 |
Sponge Hardness |
5.0 |
|
|
Review of Donic Bluefire JP 02I was using JP 01 Turbo on forhand of a Ma Lin EO JP version. Backhand DHS 555. Some players on my club are very defensive, so I was not able to play agaist them because 01 turbo was too much faster and is not good for short game. So after readind Smith review I tried JP 02, even knowing thar it has less spin than JP 01 turbo (this is a problem for me, because I prefer very grip rubbers, like skyline TG3 neo, in inspite of the weaker control of TG3). Now I have the control and the gears that I was looking for. I tried Skyline 3-60 also, but it has little spin, very different from the original skyline TG3 neo. I tried Baracuda also, but it has less spin, control and is less gripy tha JP 02. JP 02 has many gears, and if you hit strong it has a very good speed, but if you want to place the ball just after the net it is also possible. I think that I will choose this as my forhand rubber.
Nov 05, 2017 |
Stiga (1)

|
|
Stiga Neos Sound
Speed |
7.0 |
Spin |
7.0 |
Control |
8.0 |
Weight |
4.0 |
Gears |
4.0 |
|
Tackiness |
5.0 |
Throw Angle |
2.0 |
Sponge Hardness |
5.0 |
|
|
Review of Stiga Neos SoundTryed a new sheet. Didn't liked. Remembered me little a chinese rubber, because has no power, and the ball falls on net. Slow, but with poor spin. As someone told, only for begginers. Don't waste money.
Jun 05, 2014 |
Tibhar (1)

|
|
Tibhar Nimbus Soft
Speed |
7.5 |
Spin |
8.5 |
Control |
9.5 |
Weight |
2.0 |
Gears |
10.0 |
|
Tackiness |
5.0 |
Throw Angle |
6.0 |
Sponge Hardness |
3.0 |
Overall |
9.0 |
|
|
Review of Tibhar Nimbus SoftMoved from Xiom Vega Elite to Nimbus soft. NS is lighter, bit slower and have more control. Same spin. Same hardness. Easier to play, my game improved. Use both in for and backhand, RBP. Good rubber for close the table. I use in a powerfull Hinoki Speed 90, so I can smash some far and still take a good shot. But when I want, I use only the rubber in short game and it has lots of control, the ball falls just after the net with short drives. Easy to put the ball wherever you want. Suited for all round player.
Jun 05, 2014 |
Xiom (1)

|
|
Xiom Vega Elite
Speed |
8.0 |
Spin |
8.0 |
Control |
9.0 |
Weight |
2.0 |
Gears |
10.0 |
|
Throw Angle |
6.0 |
Sponge Hardness |
0.0 |
Consistency |
10.0 |
Overall |
10.0 |
|
|
Review of Xiom Vega EliteI've tested Vega Elite, Europe and Asia. Also Omega 4 Elite, Europe and Asia. Now, Vega Elite is my choice, for the gears and the best control. Other rubbers like Tenergy 05 or DHS Skyline Neo have more spin, but you have a lot in VE. I Play RPB and use it on both sides of a carbon blade (Spintech Carbon Phenom), close the table. And close the table, I don't need more speed than what it brings.
Oct 27, 2013 |