Butterfly Glayzer 09C

Glayzer O9C The top sheet with identical technology to that which is used in the Dignics 09C you can read butterfly homepage here https://www.butterfly-global.com/en/product/glayzer/ I use Glayzer O9C both in BH and FH, my bat is DONIC Original True Carbon Inner. Glayzer O9C is very similar to Hurricane 3 neo, less sticky and faster. At the beginning, the throw angle was surprisingly high after adjustment and it has lots of spin when you top spin, of course you have to have good technique like the Chinese have, then the Glayzer O9C will be deadly. In the serve you can generate a lot of spin and where this rubber shines most is on the receive. It is very easy to touch the ball short due to the stickiness and at the same time the rubber has enough power to perform forehand flicks. many people say Glayzer O9C is very slow but it is faster in I expected. If you don't top spin that much, Glayzer O9C is not for you but if you start using Glayzer O9C and start to develop it top spin you can develop quickly but then you have to learn the Chinese technique or is very similar to the Chinese technique because out of it best Glayzee O9C. Ps I would assume a sponge hardness of approx. 50-52° EUR. Officially, the hardness level is 42° JPN.

It is a rubber similar to the hurricane 3 neo in speed, control, angle, but a little softer, less sticky, lighter, with a good feel, consistent, recommended in fast blades

Review revised !!! In my opinion, this rubber is faster than indicated in the table and also generates significantly more spin. ... furthermore, it can only hold the ball for "a brief moment". My first impressions of this rubber (over 2 years ago!) were rather negative! I got the rubber (from a good friend) to test and compared it for half an hour on my stiff, fast Stuor Nobilis ZLC Hinoki with my Dignics 09 C. (both with 1.9 mm.) - and to be honest, still think that this rubber is completely underrated!!! In comparison to the Dignics 09 c, the rotation, end speed and also the throwing angle are lower, but due to the lower hardness of the Glayzer I have the impression that it has more catapult! ...which was also confirmed in my short game. When I sometimes suffer from a bit of a lack of strength, I notice how I have to "work" with my Dig.09c. It's different with the Glayzer 09 c. It's less demanding to play. In the short game and block it is much "livelier" than the Dignics 09c. (- and EVEN I can "shoot" with it!!!! :-D ) ... although I am currently using it on the very fast (old version of the) XVT ZL Koto blade. ( - to find the right blade for this rubber, is absolutely important!!!) Conclusion: this rubber is unfortunately not the "high-flyer" and "low-budget Dignics" we were hoping for, but it is a "home-made development" very close to the Dig. 09c - and as we now know, it has already found a lot of friends! What I particularly like about this rubber is that it always performs well, regardless of the type of blade!

Played with a bunch of different rubbers and this one really stood out. It's a harder rubber and has a completely different feel from Dignics versions I tried alongside. I welcome a less jumpy rubber. The spin and control were fantastic. Both serve and receive were good also. It's not the fast but it's not to slow either. I struggle to find a real negative, even the price is doable. I've decided to play it on my forehand for a while and see where it goes. If my feelings change I'll edit this post accordingly.

Started playing with a semi-pro racket about a year ago after using recreational rackets till then. My first ever racket had Glayzer 09c in the FH and Tackiness Drive in the BH (wasn't the best combo for me). However, i fell in love with this rubber and switched to using it on both sides. Great rubber for early players learning how to control and spin the ball, with enough speed to get you used to a quicker paced game. Very consistent in play and will allow just about anyone to get used to using it. :))